Some people are thick. Point.

I Couldn't Help But Wonder Why The Clothes Weren't Weirder

July 9th, 2007

I was catching up on Elastic Waist and ran across the delightful news that Sarah Jessica Parker’s clothing line, Bitten, goes up to a size 22.

Size 22! Not size 12. Not even 14. Size 22! That’s not just the barely plus-size girls like J.Hud, but also the thick girls like Queen Latifah. Hell, Lane Bryant tops out at size 28, and here’s the queen of high fashion, little teensy Sarah Jessica Parker’s line throwing out to size 22? What is more, there’s no line of demarcation there. No below size 12 and then size 14 and above. We’re all the same, just different sizes.

That’s the good news. However, word on the street is that the clothes aren’t that spectacular. Which is disappointing, because were you not expecting some insane Patricia Fields-esque Carrie Bradshaw aesthetic? I kind of was. Like, if they just made this giant peacock dress in my size, my wedding dress dilemma would be solved.

The good: Each of the pieces is less than $20, and they’re supposed to fit girls up to a size 22. The bad: It looks like anything you can buy at Wal-Mart, but with a fancier label. No need to drive the extra distance for this line.

And after watching a segment about the clothing on Oprah, the Budget Fashionista points out that the main allure of the line is SJP’s persona, not the actual clothing as such:

Take away sizing from the Bitten and you can get all those pieces from stores like Old Navy, Mandee, Marianne, Payless, Forever 21, etc. Plus the quality may leave a lot to be desired–the seams appear wavy (a sign of poor stitching) and the front of the pants were bunchy on the models…

But what I noticed the most was the lukewarm enthusiasm shown by the Oprah audience. I watch Oprah everyday and when the audience loves something, they LOVE it. They seemed pretty unmoved by the Bitten line, with Oprah at one point responding to a lukewarm reception of the audience to a $14.98 knit dress with “Come on it’s $14 dollars.” Compare that to the audience’s reaction regarding the truly impressive bridal dresses by Isaac Mizrahi at Target and you see what I mean.

I pretty much agree with this. I love budget clothes and find the concept exciting, but for that amount of money I would be able to afford to take fashion risks, and I am not seeing anything super fashiony or risky or even very designed in the collection so far. So I’m a little under-excited by the whole thing. Whereas if Isaac Mizrahi for Target ever went up to larger sizes, I would probably move out of my house and into a Michael Graves tent in the outskirts of the Target parking lot.

Posted by mo pie

Filed under: Celebrities, Fashion, Sarah Jessica Parker

You might also like

  1. Why, Old Navy? Why?
  2. Fashion Hacks
  3. Maybe We Don't Hate Dress Barn

14 Responses to I Couldn't Help But Wonder Why The Clothes Weren't Weirder

  1. Nemohee, on July 9th, 2007 at 4:54 pm Said:

    Another problem with the “Bitten” line is that the size 22 runs REALLY SMALL. I normally wear a size 18, and could barely squeeze into a pair of size 22 jeans. That to me is more disappointing than the quality of the clothes, or the lack luster designs.

    Granted, I have to give Sarah Jessica Parker credit for even attempting.

  2. Patia, on July 9th, 2007 at 4:58 pm Said:

    My question: Why stop at 22? Why not the more typical 24? Or the increasingly common 26 or 28?

    (Yes, I’m on the border between a 24 and a 26. And feeling a bit left out. Sniff.)

  3. alison, on July 9th, 2007 at 6:54 pm Said:

    maybe they’re jr. plus…

  4. Lisa, on July 9th, 2007 at 8:26 pm Said:

    Even though I haven’t seen the line in person, checking out the website, the clothes look really cute. I’m impressed that they go as high as a 22, as most designers don’t seem to care to cater to larger sizes…or eventually remove their entire plus size line. Stupid Old Navy (even though my local Old Navy still carries XXL throughout their whole ladies section).

  5. Rachel, on July 9th, 2007 at 10:00 pm Said:

    I saw the line in Dave & Barry’s in the mall. Personally, I thought the clothes were very cheaply manufactured and not terribly fashionable. Of course, Dave & Barry’s isn’t a high-end store to begin with (most items sell for below $10).

    Also, though some of the clothes I saw were plus-size, they weren’t manufactured with a plus girl’s body in mind. They look like shapeless sacks, actually. Not very figure-flattering.

  6. ho_cho, on July 9th, 2007 at 10:27 pm Said:

    It’s very disappointing to go shopping and put on cute clothes and look ridiculous in them. Besides the pressing and obvious problem of absolutely NO awesome clothes for plus size women, no woman with any type of body approaching normal has an easy time shopping. I read the very ceremonious SJP manifesto and while i am deeply touched that she has such concern for my wallet i think a more appropriate statement would be for the inalienable right of all women to not have to alter the clothing they buy because it fits only a small fraction of the population.

  7. MizShrew, on July 9th, 2007 at 11:07 pm Said:

    Alison, I’m guessing you’re right and that the sizing may be geared toward a junior size/shape. And, if they’re using tiny sizes for the fit models and sizing up from there, that might account for the poor fit in the plus size range. I can’t say for certain, as they’re not available in my area, but in the price range I doubt that they’re designing those clothes with both regular and plus size fit models.

    That said, I’ll give her credit for the expanded size range. It’s a shame to hear the stuff is poorly made — I rather liked a couple of the pieces on the website, and would certainly have been willing to pay another few bucks to get something that wouldn’t fall apart in the first wash. Ah well…

  8. enchanted_black, on July 9th, 2007 at 11:17 pm Said:

    And here I was all excited about her catering to my size 22 behind. *pouts* Darn it. I’ll stick to Lane Bryant then. At least I get my employee discount and really cute clothing.

  9. Christine, on July 10th, 2007 at 1:34 am Said:

    Finally someone in the clothing world acknowledging the bigger sizes in the world. thanks so much for sharing this.

  10. spacedcowgirl, on July 10th, 2007 at 4:05 pm Said:

    “Take away sizing from the Bitten and you can get all those pieces from stores like Old Navy, Mandee, Marianne, Payless, Forever 21, etc.”

    Isn’t this kind of the point though? It would be a cold day in hell before anything in Forever 21 would fit me, and this will probably still be true even if I get to my goal weight. I was looking at some Forever 21 dresses and I’d kill to be able to wear them, cheap and trendy though they may be. So the sole fact that Bitten has a larger size range than other lines is a great coup.

    Nevertheless, Steve & Barry’s has the most cheaply made, inconsistent crap you can possibly imagine. Worse than Old Navy. Credit where credit’s due, they actually make a serviceable peacoat for $10 and I imagine they are a godsend for parents of teenagers on a budget–the clothes are cute and fashionable. But come on, the stuff is like $15 and under. Back in my day, we used to expect to have to pay at least a moderate amount to get clothes that were well-made, well-tailored, and durable. Now it seems like we expect clothes to be $10 or $15 (a price that when I was a kid would have meant you were getting something more like a trendy, throwaway piece) but also consistent in sizing, high-quality, and manufactured under acceptable labor practices. All of which are good things but I’m not sure you can realistically expect to get them without shelling out a little more.

  11. Kim, on July 11th, 2007 at 11:31 am Said:

    Don’t forget that it takes more fabric to make bigger clothes. Which means they cost more for the manufacturer to make.

    It’s possible they are discriminating against larger women deliberately, but I’d say it’s much more likely to be about the bottom line.

    They can’t charge more for larger sizes, so they have to charge more for all the sizes or reduce the quality instead. Which means dodgier seams, and fewer bells and whistles.

    I imagine it’s quite a risk to have a single line span all the different sizes.

  12. spacedcowgirl, on July 11th, 2007 at 11:58 am Said:

    That’s a little bit of a leap. There’s no reason they couldn’t just charge a dollar or two more for the 3 largest sizes, say, if it was that big of a deal. But I honestly doubt that the extra fabric really makes that much difference anyway. Steve & Barry’s really does just specialize in bargain basement crap of the most cheaply made variety. Doesn’t mean I don’t love my cheapy team sweatshirts and stuff from there, but its poor quality and inconsistent seams, sizing, printing, etc. cannot be denied even before Bitten existed.

    I know you’re not assigning “blame” exactly but that’s one argument I’ve never heard before… making clothes in plus sizes will drag down the quality of an entire line. I know on the surface there is a simple dollars and cents equation in there–more fabric = more $–but I just don’t believe the price of fabric makes enough difference to the bottom line price of a garment to cause such an outcome. I’m sure manufacturers would like us to think that so they can charge an arm and a leg for plus, but I have my suspicions.

  13. Meghan, on July 11th, 2007 at 3:18 pm Said:

    I have been to Steve & Barrys and seen the clothes and was not at all impressed. Cheap and even poorly made are fine with me, if the clothes are trendy and cute and, but her stuff is very, very basic. I could not find one piece that had a bit of interest or personality. The jewelry was nice, but expensive compared to the clothes.

    Even worse than the lack of character in the clothes was this heinous video of SJP they kept playing, over and over at high volume, in which she is on some egotistical head trip about how ALL women, even if we live in trailers and collect welfare and never even once owned a Chanel bag, even if we stuff our faces with Cheetos and Krispie Kremes and never purge, deserve to wear her cheap, crappy, unstylish clothes. Like we are cavemen and she is giving the gift of fire or something.

  14. mo pie, on July 11th, 2007 at 3:26 pm Said:

    “Like we are cavemen and she is giving the gift of fire or something.”

    Ha! That’s hilarious.

Subscribe to the comments for this post (RSS)

« Or Maybe Not?
Willpower Is Power »

RSS button Entries RSS

RSS button Comments RSS

Email us

Look around
  • What's the Big Fat Deal?
  • Introduce yourself
  • How do I love myself? And the follow up.
  • Our Facebook group
  • BFD greatest hits
  • 10 Ways to be a Body Positivity Advocate
  • Our pet fish
  • Press and media
We are...
Image of Mo Pie Image of Weetabix Image of Jenfu
Find it
Meta
+ Click to display
  • Log in
  • Entries RSS
  • Comments RSS
  •  
  • Google Reader or Homepage
  • del.icio.us 43 Folders
  • Add to My Yahoo!
  • Subscribe with Bloglines
  • Subscribe in NewsGator Online
  • Furl 43 Folders
  • Add to Technorati Favorites!
  • Add to netvibes
  • Health Blogs - Blog Top Sites
  • Pop Culture Blogs -  Blog Catalog Blog Directory
  • Blogging Fusion Blog Directory
  • I fight fat-hate!
  • B-List Blogger
  • Bloggapedia, Blog Directory - Find It!
  • As Seen on Delightfulblogs.com
  • Blogarama - The Blog Directory
  • Top HealthCare Sites
  • + Click to hide
Your comments
  • Babs: So sorry to hear that you are moving to Facebook. I’m one of those “dinosaurs” who refused to...
  • Trish: I’m a heavier girl, and throughout my pregnancy so far I’ve not thought too much about looking...
  • Rhonwyyn: Hi Mali, So sorry you’re feeling this way. I was never very skinny, but I learned to hate my body as...
  • Jody: I just got this cute Disney Nerds bag at Disneyland this January. It was only $20 and the strap is super long....
  • Courtney: I found one at H&M. Can’t wear a damn thing from that store except their bags, and it was under...
Recent entries
  • New BFD Page on Facebook
  • Recommend A Crossbody Bag
  • It Happened To Me: I Read xoJane.com
  • Actor Gains 50 Pounds, Becomes "Much Funnier"?
  • Nordstrom Rack Fall Outfit Extravaganza
  • Say Yes To The Dress: Big Bliss
Notes from the Fatosphere
Most Popular Categories
  • Advertising Advocacy America Ferrera American Idol Art Ask BFD Beth Ditto BFD Classic BFDudes Biggest Loser BlogHer08 Books Britney Spears Carnie Wilson Celebrities Cold Hard Cash Comics Courtney Love Dance Your Ass Off Diet Talk Diet Talk Warning Drop Dead Diva Eating Disorders Exercise Fashion Fatism Fat Positive Fat Suits Feel Good Friday Feminism Food Gabby Sidibe Glee Gossip Guest Post Gwyneth Paltrow Hairspray Health Huge Humor International Jenfu Jennifer Aniston Jennifer Hudson Jennifer Love Hewitt Jessica Simpson Kate Winslet Keira Knightley Kelly Clarkson Kids Kirstie Alley Links Magazines Media Meta Mike & Molly Mo'Nique Mommyblog More To Love Movies Music Nikki Blonsky NSFW Old Navy Old Timey Oprah Personal Photoshop Politics Project Runway Queen Latifah Question Race & Ethnicity Renee Zelwegger Review Ricki Lake Ricky Gervais Science Sex & Romance Star Jones Theater The Office Tidbit TV Tyra Banks Uncategorized Video Weetabix Weight Loss WLS Work

Twitter
[aktt_tweets count="5"]
Most Comments
  • Nordstrom Rack Fall Outfit Extravaganza (232)
  • How Do Strangers Treat You? (134)
  • "The Beautiful People Are The Skinny People" (103)
  • "You Do Not See Fat People In Concentration Camps" (100)
  • Are You Insecure About Your Height? (97)
  • Big Fat Ad (91)
Archives
Powered by WordPress & WPDesigner :: Design by Pattycake Designs & modified by Make My Blog Pretty :: Logo by Evan Carothers