<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &quot;500-Pound Chocoholic&quot; At Dear Prudence</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bfdblog.com/2009/02/10/500-pound-chocoholic-at-dear-prudence/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bfdblog.com/2009/02/10/500-pound-chocoholic-at-dear-prudence/</link>
	<description>We&#039;re bringing chubby back.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 16:13:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah</title>
		<link>http://www.bfdblog.com/2009/02/10/500-pound-chocoholic-at-dear-prudence/comment-page-1/#comment-15620</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 03:38:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bfdblog.com/?p=791#comment-15620</guid>
		<description>Lisa-Marie, the health of an individual is, well, individual. It&#039;s not your right to stick your nose in other people&#039;s business, unless they ASK you for it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lisa-Marie, the health of an individual is, well, individual. It&#8217;s not your right to stick your nose in other people&#8217;s business, unless they ASK you for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Punchy</title>
		<link>http://www.bfdblog.com/2009/02/10/500-pound-chocoholic-at-dear-prudence/comment-page-1/#comment-15619</link>
		<dc:creator>Punchy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 03:03:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bfdblog.com/?p=791#comment-15619</guid>
		<description>I think what the commenter meant by suggesting veggies at the meeting instead of chocolate was that IF this guy was actually CONCERNED, and not just being a tool, he could bring veggies or something. That would have been a more prudent (tee hee) answer. But obviously, the guy is not really concerned about his co-worker, it&#039;s just an excuse to poke fun at fatty.

I hope the guy does say something about Clarence&#039;s weight, and then I hope Clarence sues the hell out of him for harassment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think what the commenter meant by suggesting veggies at the meeting instead of chocolate was that IF this guy was actually CONCERNED, and not just being a tool, he could bring veggies or something. That would have been a more prudent (tee hee) answer. But obviously, the guy is not really concerned about his co-worker, it&#8217;s just an excuse to poke fun at fatty.</p>
<p>I hope the guy does say something about Clarence&#8217;s weight, and then I hope Clarence sues the hell out of him for harassment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lisa-marie</title>
		<link>http://www.bfdblog.com/2009/02/10/500-pound-chocoholic-at-dear-prudence/comment-page-1/#comment-15608</link>
		<dc:creator>lisa-marie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 20:28:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bfdblog.com/?p=791#comment-15608</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Lindsey! Love you, too!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Lindsey! Love you, too!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: goodbyemyboy</title>
		<link>http://www.bfdblog.com/2009/02/10/500-pound-chocoholic-at-dear-prudence/comment-page-1/#comment-15609</link>
		<dc:creator>goodbyemyboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 17:24:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bfdblog.com/?p=791#comment-15609</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;I seriously doubt that this man ate an entire bowl of candy right in front of people. I’ve been around the litter-covered block with trolls before and it just sounds like too much like sensationalism dripping with hysteria to be true. If someone works in a business setting, they are not likely to do something like this. Hell, fat people themselves aren’t likely to do this. No, this sounds too much like a caricature.

I also question how the letter-scribbler knew Clarance’s weight. “500 pounds” to a lot of lighter people often ends up being anywhere from 200-300 pounds, rarely more.&lt;/i&gt;

Absolutely this.

&lt;i&gt;Prudence is also the columnist who wrote this great response to the girl whose boyfriend said she was too fat. It sems her response might have been different if the woman had weighed 500 pounds, though.&lt;/i&gt;

I think that this sort of almost-fat acceptance is very common--that it&#039;s bad to be prejudiced against &quot;normal-sized&quot; fat people but not the &lt;i&gt;really&lt;/i&gt; fat people. Or that fat people can be healthy but clearly not the &lt;i&gt;really&lt;/i&gt; fat people. Or that it&#039;s okay for women to be slightly chubby because &quot;men like that&quot; but &lt;i&gt;really&lt;/i&gt; fat women or men are just gross.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I seriously doubt that this man ate an entire bowl of candy right in front of people. I’ve been around the litter-covered block with trolls before and it just sounds like too much like sensationalism dripping with hysteria to be true. If someone works in a business setting, they are not likely to do something like this. Hell, fat people themselves aren’t likely to do this. No, this sounds too much like a caricature.</p>
<p>I also question how the letter-scribbler knew Clarance’s weight. “500 pounds” to a lot of lighter people often ends up being anywhere from 200-300 pounds, rarely more.</i></p>
<p>Absolutely this.</p>
<p><i>Prudence is also the columnist who wrote this great response to the girl whose boyfriend said she was too fat. It sems her response might have been different if the woman had weighed 500 pounds, though.</i></p>
<p>I think that this sort of almost-fat acceptance is very common&#8211;that it&#8217;s bad to be prejudiced against &#8220;normal-sized&#8221; fat people but not the <i>really</i> fat people. Or that fat people can be healthy but clearly not the <i>really</i> fat people. Or that it&#8217;s okay for women to be slightly chubby because &#8220;men like that&#8221; but <i>really</i> fat women or men are just gross.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Meowser</title>
		<link>http://www.bfdblog.com/2009/02/10/500-pound-chocoholic-at-dear-prudence/comment-page-1/#comment-15606</link>
		<dc:creator>Meowser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 08:39:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bfdblog.com/?p=791#comment-15606</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;I hate candy bowls with a passion because they usually mean that someone is going to want to have a talk with me about how I ate all of the candy even though I didn’t have any. “We know you did because we watched you!” &lt;/em&gt;

And anyone who wants to know why we spend any time torpedoing the idea that all fatasses stuff their faces nonstop, look no further than this comment.  This belief turns into scapegoating faster than you can peel a carrot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>I hate candy bowls with a passion because they usually mean that someone is going to want to have a talk with me about how I ate all of the candy even though I didn’t have any. “We know you did because we watched you!” </em></p>
<p>And anyone who wants to know why we spend any time torpedoing the idea that all fatasses stuff their faces nonstop, look no further than this comment.  This belief turns into scapegoating faster than you can peel a carrot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fatadelic</title>
		<link>http://www.bfdblog.com/2009/02/10/500-pound-chocoholic-at-dear-prudence/comment-page-1/#comment-15605</link>
		<dc:creator>Fatadelic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 06:15:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bfdblog.com/?p=791#comment-15605</guid>
		<description>The letter writer AND Prudence both have an (un)healthy dose of fat hatred there.

The letter writer&#039;s tone strikes me as exaggeration for effect (much in the way that Playboy letters are exaggerated for effect) so I highly doubt that the fat man ate what he has been alleged to eat. Perhaps there&#039;s a bit of confirmation bias as well, you know, &#039;I expect a fat person to eat huge amounts and since all the chocolate has gone, it must have been the fat guy&#039;.  And as to his weight, we all know how accurate looking at someone is to guess weight - NOT. Oh and the &#039;concern&#039; for his health? Give me a break.

Even though Prudence advised that the coworker not say anything to the guy, she also cheesed me off.

First, she didn&#039;t even consider that this supposedly concerned colleague may have been lying or exaggerating. Secondly, there&#039;s all the fat jokes in the animation (large shadow looming over a vunnerable co-worker, for instance).  And finally there&#039;s her judgementalism :

&quot;Clarence obviously knows that he weighs 500 pounds and is killing himself&quot;  EESH. So many faulty assumptions there.

He&#039;s &quot;out of control&quot; Yeah? Says who? The food police?

GGGRR!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The letter writer AND Prudence both have an (un)healthy dose of fat hatred there.</p>
<p>The letter writer&#8217;s tone strikes me as exaggeration for effect (much in the way that Playboy letters are exaggerated for effect) so I highly doubt that the fat man ate what he has been alleged to eat. Perhaps there&#8217;s a bit of confirmation bias as well, you know, &#8216;I expect a fat person to eat huge amounts and since all the chocolate has gone, it must have been the fat guy&#8217;.  And as to his weight, we all know how accurate looking at someone is to guess weight &#8211; NOT. Oh and the &#8216;concern&#8217; for his health? Give me a break.</p>
<p>Even though Prudence advised that the coworker not say anything to the guy, she also cheesed me off.</p>
<p>First, she didn&#8217;t even consider that this supposedly concerned colleague may have been lying or exaggerating. Secondly, there&#8217;s all the fat jokes in the animation (large shadow looming over a vunnerable co-worker, for instance).  And finally there&#8217;s her judgementalism :</p>
<p>&#8220;Clarence obviously knows that he weighs 500 pounds and is killing himself&#8221;  EESH. So many faulty assumptions there.</p>
<p>He&#8217;s &#8220;out of control&#8221; Yeah? Says who? The food police?</p>
<p>GGGRR!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Godless Heathen</title>
		<link>http://www.bfdblog.com/2009/02/10/500-pound-chocoholic-at-dear-prudence/comment-page-1/#comment-15604</link>
		<dc:creator>Godless Heathen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 00:44:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bfdblog.com/?p=791#comment-15604</guid>
		<description>To the &quot;concerned&quot; person who said the candy should be switched to veggies:

Meetings are often accompanied by sweets because sweet foods keep employees alert, attentive, and receptive.  Our little mammal brains really work better with some additional glucose.  Managers know this because it&#039;s intuitive, and also because it&#039;s often suggested at management seminars as a way to keep employees happy and productive at meetings.  Taking the sweets out of meetings may have some infinitesimal &quot;health benefits&quot;, but those benefits would be offset by having everyone at the table nod off during Bob&#039;s presentation.  Never going to happen.

Companies are out to make money, not to babysit their employees.  That&#039;s the way it&#039;s supposed to work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To the &#8220;concerned&#8221; person who said the candy should be switched to veggies:</p>
<p>Meetings are often accompanied by sweets because sweet foods keep employees alert, attentive, and receptive.  Our little mammal brains really work better with some additional glucose.  Managers know this because it&#8217;s intuitive, and also because it&#8217;s often suggested at management seminars as a way to keep employees happy and productive at meetings.  Taking the sweets out of meetings may have some infinitesimal &#8220;health benefits&#8221;, but those benefits would be offset by having everyone at the table nod off during Bob&#8217;s presentation.  Never going to happen.</p>
<p>Companies are out to make money, not to babysit their employees.  That&#8217;s the way it&#8217;s supposed to work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: living400lbs</title>
		<link>http://www.bfdblog.com/2009/02/10/500-pound-chocoholic-at-dear-prudence/comment-page-1/#comment-15603</link>
		<dc:creator>living400lbs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 23:29:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bfdblog.com/?p=791#comment-15603</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;I also question how the letter-scribbler knew Clarance’s weight. “500 pounds” to a lot of lighter people often ends up being anywhere from 200-300 pounds, rarely more.&lt;/i&gt;

I tend to have the opposite - people think I weigh less.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I also question how the letter-scribbler knew Clarance’s weight. “500 pounds” to a lot of lighter people often ends up being anywhere from 200-300 pounds, rarely more.</i></p>
<p>I tend to have the opposite &#8211; people think I weigh less.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bree</title>
		<link>http://www.bfdblog.com/2009/02/10/500-pound-chocoholic-at-dear-prudence/comment-page-1/#comment-15602</link>
		<dc:creator>Bree</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 23:18:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bfdblog.com/?p=791#comment-15602</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;I seriously doubt that this man ate an entire bowl of candy right in front of people. I’ve been around the litter-covered block with trolls before and it just sounds like too much like sensationalism dripping with hysteria to be true. If someone works in a business setting, they are not likely to do something like this. Hell, fat people themselves aren’t likely to do this. No, this sounds too much like a caricature.

I also question how the letter-scribbler knew Clarance’s weight. “500 pounds” to a lot of lighter people often ends up being anywhere from 200-300 pounds, rarely more.&lt;/i&gt;

THIS.

And, if this man is eating up all the candy, is he doing it because he&#039;s on a restricted diet at home where no sweets of any kind are allowed?

People need to slow down and start thinking before they put on their &quot;fat-people-ruin-my-life!&quot; suit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I seriously doubt that this man ate an entire bowl of candy right in front of people. I’ve been around the litter-covered block with trolls before and it just sounds like too much like sensationalism dripping with hysteria to be true. If someone works in a business setting, they are not likely to do something like this. Hell, fat people themselves aren’t likely to do this. No, this sounds too much like a caricature.</p>
<p>I also question how the letter-scribbler knew Clarance’s weight. “500 pounds” to a lot of lighter people often ends up being anywhere from 200-300 pounds, rarely more.</i></p>
<p>THIS.</p>
<p>And, if this man is eating up all the candy, is he doing it because he&#8217;s on a restricted diet at home where no sweets of any kind are allowed?</p>
<p>People need to slow down and start thinking before they put on their &#8220;fat-people-ruin-my-life!&#8221; suit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: twilightriver</title>
		<link>http://www.bfdblog.com/2009/02/10/500-pound-chocoholic-at-dear-prudence/comment-page-1/#comment-15592</link>
		<dc:creator>twilightriver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 23:08:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bfdblog.com/?p=791#comment-15592</guid>
		<description>Given how many times I&#039;ve been accused of eating the entire bowl of candy just because I was in the same room as a candy dish, I&#039;m guessing the problem has more to do with perception than objective fact.

After the first time I had an &quot;intervention&quot; because &quot;everybody watched you eat the entire candy bowl in one sitting&quot; I never touched communal candy.

When I continued to receive &quot;interventions&quot; and kept hearing &quot;we know it&#039;s you because the bowl is always half full when you aren&#039;t around and completely empty when you are,&quot; I knew that the problem was not mine.

I hate candy bowls with a passion because they usually mean that someone is going to want to have a talk with me about how I ate all of the candy even though I didn&#039;t have any. &quot;We know you did because we watched you!&quot;

People are always watching me eat stuff that I never eat. According to them, I eat junk food every day, never touch anything green, and devour sugar like it&#039;s going out of style. I&#039;d like to know when they are seeing me eating all of that stuff because my digestive intolerance to anything derived from corn has me on a deeply restrictive diet so that I can continue to function on a healthy level.

The last time I ate something that wasn&#039;t prepared from scratch using vegetables, fruit, whole grains, and a lean source of protein was August &#039;07. Yet, I am still accused of living on processed foods and refined sugars because &quot;we watch you eat that junk all the time.&quot; Riiiiight.

I&#039;ll start believing that people are genuinely concerned for the health of others when they stop accepting their hallucinations as fact.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Given how many times I&#8217;ve been accused of eating the entire bowl of candy just because I was in the same room as a candy dish, I&#8217;m guessing the problem has more to do with perception than objective fact.</p>
<p>After the first time I had an &#8220;intervention&#8221; because &#8220;everybody watched you eat the entire candy bowl in one sitting&#8221; I never touched communal candy.</p>
<p>When I continued to receive &#8220;interventions&#8221; and kept hearing &#8220;we know it&#8217;s you because the bowl is always half full when you aren&#8217;t around and completely empty when you are,&#8221; I knew that the problem was not mine.</p>
<p>I hate candy bowls with a passion because they usually mean that someone is going to want to have a talk with me about how I ate all of the candy even though I didn&#8217;t have any. &#8220;We know you did because we watched you!&#8221;</p>
<p>People are always watching me eat stuff that I never eat. According to them, I eat junk food every day, never touch anything green, and devour sugar like it&#8217;s going out of style. I&#8217;d like to know when they are seeing me eating all of that stuff because my digestive intolerance to anything derived from corn has me on a deeply restrictive diet so that I can continue to function on a healthy level.</p>
<p>The last time I ate something that wasn&#8217;t prepared from scratch using vegetables, fruit, whole grains, and a lean source of protein was August &#8217;07. Yet, I am still accused of living on processed foods and refined sugars because &#8220;we watch you eat that junk all the time.&#8221; Riiiiight.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll start believing that people are genuinely concerned for the health of others when they stop accepting their hallucinations as fact.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
