<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Science Of Portion Control</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bfdblog.com/2008/01/15/the-science-of-portion-control/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bfdblog.com/2008/01/15/the-science-of-portion-control/</link>
	<description>We&#039;re bringing chubby back.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 18:02:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: C</title>
		<link>http://www.bfdblog.com/2008/01/15/the-science-of-portion-control/comment-page-1/#comment-7725</link>
		<dc:creator>C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 00:21:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bfdblog.com/?p=315#comment-7725</guid>
		<description>Regardless of how much I weigh, I&#039;m always hungry.  ALWAYS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regardless of how much I weigh, I&#8217;m always hungry.  ALWAYS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wriggles</title>
		<link>http://www.bfdblog.com/2008/01/15/the-science-of-portion-control/comment-page-1/#comment-7723</link>
		<dc:creator>wriggles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 17:46:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bfdblog.com/?p=315#comment-7723</guid>
		<description>Re: the study- total 18 people.

It seems to be saying that the extent to which your left posterior amygdala is acitivated, is your &#039;portion control&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: the study- total 18 people.</p>
<p>It seems to be saying that the extent to which your left posterior amygdala is acitivated, is your &#8216;portion control&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fatfighter</title>
		<link>http://www.bfdblog.com/2008/01/15/the-science-of-portion-control/comment-page-1/#comment-7722</link>
		<dc:creator>fatfighter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 20:01:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bfdblog.com/?p=315#comment-7722</guid>
		<description>What IS it with men! My bf lives on Taco Bell, McDonald&#039;s, potato chips and chinese takeout and is a twig. We&#039;re talking 4000 kc a day here! I eat twice the volume he eats (but given that I&#039;m eating 90% raw vegetables I&#039;m still small) but if I ate what he eats I would be floating over football games with GOODYEAR on my face.

It&#039;s really not fair, I think. And it&#039;s unbelievable the amount of fights we have over where to eat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What IS it with men! My bf lives on Taco Bell, McDonald&#8217;s, potato chips and chinese takeout and is a twig. We&#8217;re talking 4000 kc a day here! I eat twice the volume he eats (but given that I&#8217;m eating 90% raw vegetables I&#8217;m still small) but if I ate what he eats I would be floating over football games with GOODYEAR on my face.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s really not fair, I think. And it&#8217;s unbelievable the amount of fights we have over where to eat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mo pie</title>
		<link>http://www.bfdblog.com/2008/01/15/the-science-of-portion-control/comment-page-1/#comment-7721</link>
		<dc:creator>mo pie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 18:04:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bfdblog.com/?p=315#comment-7721</guid>
		<description>That sounds like my husband.  Sometimes I have to remind him that he doesn&#039;t have to finish absolutely everything on the plate! (He also is thin, by the way, so another anecdotal counterpoint to the original story.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That sounds like my husband.  Sometimes I have to remind him that he doesn&#8217;t have to finish absolutely everything on the plate! (He also is thin, by the way, so another anecdotal counterpoint to the original story.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AnnieMcPhee</title>
		<link>http://www.bfdblog.com/2008/01/15/the-science-of-portion-control/comment-page-1/#comment-7720</link>
		<dc:creator>AnnieMcPhee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 18:02:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bfdblog.com/?p=315#comment-7720</guid>
		<description>This is just an anecdote but it&#039;s related to portions and it&#039;s kind of funny.   I made a london broil one time for dinner - it weighed two pounds and was meant to be a family dinner, likely with leftovers.  My husband just thought it was his steak.  It seemed a bit large, but whatever.  So he set about eating it, and he couldn&#039;t believe, as he kept eating it, how long it was taking.   Then, with just a little left to go, he said &quot;I don&#039;t think I can finish this.&quot;   I said, &quot;Well, hon, it was a 2 lb piece of meat, it wasn&#039;t meant to be a single steak for one person hehe.&quot;  But I guess sometimes when you just think that&#039;s your portion, you may go ahead and eat it, even if it is too much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is just an anecdote but it&#8217;s related to portions and it&#8217;s kind of funny.   I made a london broil one time for dinner &#8211; it weighed two pounds and was meant to be a family dinner, likely with leftovers.  My husband just thought it was his steak.  It seemed a bit large, but whatever.  So he set about eating it, and he couldn&#8217;t believe, as he kept eating it, how long it was taking.   Then, with just a little left to go, he said &#8220;I don&#8217;t think I can finish this.&#8221;   I said, &#8220;Well, hon, it was a 2 lb piece of meat, it wasn&#8217;t meant to be a single steak for one person hehe.&#8221;  But I guess sometimes when you just think that&#8217;s your portion, you may go ahead and eat it, even if it is too much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emily</title>
		<link>http://www.bfdblog.com/2008/01/15/the-science-of-portion-control/comment-page-1/#comment-7718</link>
		<dc:creator>Emily</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 21:09:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bfdblog.com/?p=315#comment-7718</guid>
		<description>Littlem-
I&#039;m sorry if you interpreted what I said as patronizing, it wasn&#039;t meant that way.  One of the dangers of written communication, I suppose.   Clearly you read what I had written as patronizing when it wasn&#039;t meant to be, and I read what you wrote as serious when it wasn&#039;t meant to be.  I apologize for any misinterpretation on my part.

As for mentioning the article, you&#039;re right, no one asked about it, I mentioned it because I thought it might interest people who found the article in the OP interesting.  I wasn&#039;t trying to bring it to the attention of people who already knew about it, that would be silly.  Clearly people who have already, recently, done extensive research into the matter would already know about it, but I was unaware that it was common knowladge, since I had only heard about it in connection to the Ignobels, which is hardly mainstream.  I was just trying to point out something I thought a few people who read this might find interesting and not have seen.  I don&#039;t see what you could object to there, so I&#039;m a bit confused.
As for the offer to track down the article, it wasn&#039;t an offer to hand anyone a conclusion, it was an offer to look up the citation for the article so that interested people could find it more easily that trying to Google it based on my general description, which I didn&#039;t have the time to do when I made the first comment.  Again, I don&#039;t see what the problem would be there.  I didn&#039;t mean to be offensive, and I&#039;d love to know exactly what I said that seems to have you upset, so that I can avoid it in the future. (Unless of course, you&#039;re exaggerating for effect again?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Littlem-<br />
I&#8217;m sorry if you interpreted what I said as patronizing, it wasn&#8217;t meant that way.  One of the dangers of written communication, I suppose.   Clearly you read what I had written as patronizing when it wasn&#8217;t meant to be, and I read what you wrote as serious when it wasn&#8217;t meant to be.  I apologize for any misinterpretation on my part.</p>
<p>As for mentioning the article, you&#8217;re right, no one asked about it, I mentioned it because I thought it might interest people who found the article in the OP interesting.  I wasn&#8217;t trying to bring it to the attention of people who already knew about it, that would be silly.  Clearly people who have already, recently, done extensive research into the matter would already know about it, but I was unaware that it was common knowladge, since I had only heard about it in connection to the Ignobels, which is hardly mainstream.  I was just trying to point out something I thought a few people who read this might find interesting and not have seen.  I don&#8217;t see what you could object to there, so I&#8217;m a bit confused.<br />
As for the offer to track down the article, it wasn&#8217;t an offer to hand anyone a conclusion, it was an offer to look up the citation for the article so that interested people could find it more easily that trying to Google it based on my general description, which I didn&#8217;t have the time to do when I made the first comment.  Again, I don&#8217;t see what the problem would be there.  I didn&#8217;t mean to be offensive, and I&#8217;d love to know exactly what I said that seems to have you upset, so that I can avoid it in the future. (Unless of course, you&#8217;re exaggerating for effect again?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: littlem</title>
		<link>http://www.bfdblog.com/2008/01/15/the-science-of-portion-control/comment-page-1/#comment-7719</link>
		<dc:creator>littlem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 20:45:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bfdblog.com/?p=315#comment-7719</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;&quot;Calm down.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

&lt;b&gt;Emily.&lt;/b&gt;  Don&#039;t be patronizing.  It&#039;s obnoxious.  There&#039;s this thing called &quot;hyperbole for effect&quot;.  Look it up.

&lt;i&gt;&quot;I can try to look up the study if you’re interested, it won an Ignobel prize this fall. :)&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

Those of us that far along in having analyzed portion control have probably already read that study and come to our own conclusions and don&#039;t need you to do it for us.  Plus, I don&#039;t recall anyone asking.
*kthx*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&#8220;Calm down.&#8221;</i></p>
<p><b>Emily.</b>  Don&#8217;t be patronizing.  It&#8217;s obnoxious.  There&#8217;s this thing called &#8220;hyperbole for effect&#8221;.  Look it up.</p>
<p><i>&#8220;I can try to look up the study if you’re interested, it won an Ignobel prize this fall. :)&#8221;</i></p>
<p>Those of us that far along in having analyzed portion control have probably already read that study and come to our own conclusions and don&#8217;t need you to do it for us.  Plus, I don&#8217;t recall anyone asking.<br />
*kthx*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fat Girl</title>
		<link>http://www.bfdblog.com/2008/01/15/the-science-of-portion-control/comment-page-1/#comment-7717</link>
		<dc:creator>Fat Girl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 17:41:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bfdblog.com/?p=315#comment-7717</guid>
		<description>Not sure how I feel about this, but it makes me remember what my mom always said- that our stomachs stretch out from eating too much (poor thing, she really did think that she was fat just because she overate..  I found some old journals of hers I&#039;ve been posting on my blog and it&#039;s just heartbreaking).

Anyhow, I don&#039;t know whether that&#039;s true or not but it&#039;s also something that might be worth considering.  I mean, what if their stomachs were just bigger?

Anyway, I don&#039;t think it&#039;s any big secret that portion control is the thing.  And mindful eating.  It&#039;s too easy these days to just go nuts eating crap without even thinking about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure how I feel about this, but it makes me remember what my mom always said- that our stomachs stretch out from eating too much (poor thing, she really did think that she was fat just because she overate..  I found some old journals of hers I&#8217;ve been posting on my blog and it&#8217;s just heartbreaking).</p>
<p>Anyhow, I don&#8217;t know whether that&#8217;s true or not but it&#8217;s also something that might be worth considering.  I mean, what if their stomachs were just bigger?</p>
<p>Anyway, I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s any big secret that portion control is the thing.  And mindful eating.  It&#8217;s too easy these days to just go nuts eating crap without even thinking about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fatfighter</title>
		<link>http://www.bfdblog.com/2008/01/15/the-science-of-portion-control/comment-page-1/#comment-7716</link>
		<dc:creator>fatfighter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 13:38:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bfdblog.com/?p=315#comment-7716</guid>
		<description>This reminds me of when gastric bypass started getting lots of coverage. People started screaming OMGZ WHAT IZ NEXT FATTY ROUNDUP etc.

I&#039;m pretty sure even if they develop a brain surgery that addresses this avenue of weight loss it will be elective. Honestly, sometimes some of you sound like you&#039;re about two comments away from getting all Ipcress File about everyone who studies weight.  Not everything is an anti-fatty conspiracy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This reminds me of when gastric bypass started getting lots of coverage. People started screaming OMGZ WHAT IZ NEXT FATTY ROUNDUP etc.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m pretty sure even if they develop a brain surgery that addresses this avenue of weight loss it will be elective. Honestly, sometimes some of you sound like you&#8217;re about two comments away from getting all Ipcress File about everyone who studies weight.  Not everything is an anti-fatty conspiracy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emily</title>
		<link>http://www.bfdblog.com/2008/01/15/the-science-of-portion-control/comment-page-1/#comment-7715</link>
		<dc:creator>Emily</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 06:19:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bfdblog.com/?p=315#comment-7715</guid>
		<description>Goodness, I hardly think this is something to get so stressed about.  Surgical was just one of the three options for treatment that they were talking about considering looking into.  That&#039;s a far cry from mandatory brain surgery for all people with a BMI over 12 (and I can tell you from experience, if your  BMI is under 20, you get attacked for not eating enough, so I don&#039;t think we&#039;re anywhere close to thinking that 12 is overweight.  Calm down.)  It&#039;s just a study showing that different people respond to food in different ways.  Isn&#039;t that exactly what you&#039;ve been arguing?

Anyway, I just wanted to point out that there was another study along the lines of portion control (although not related to weight loss specifically) showing that most people will continue to eat soup until the bowl is empty, regardless of the actual volume of soup consumed.  They used a self refilling bowl and found that people would eat liters of soup without reporting being full as long as there was still soup in the bowl.  This seems to indicate that most of the people in the study were using external factors to determine how much to eat, rather than paying attention to signals from their body.  I can try to look up the study if you&#039;re interested, it won an Ignobel prize this fall. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Goodness, I hardly think this is something to get so stressed about.  Surgical was just one of the three options for treatment that they were talking about considering looking into.  That&#8217;s a far cry from mandatory brain surgery for all people with a BMI over 12 (and I can tell you from experience, if your  BMI is under 20, you get attacked for not eating enough, so I don&#8217;t think we&#8217;re anywhere close to thinking that 12 is overweight.  Calm down.)  It&#8217;s just a study showing that different people respond to food in different ways.  Isn&#8217;t that exactly what you&#8217;ve been arguing?</p>
<p>Anyway, I just wanted to point out that there was another study along the lines of portion control (although not related to weight loss specifically) showing that most people will continue to eat soup until the bowl is empty, regardless of the actual volume of soup consumed.  They used a self refilling bowl and found that people would eat liters of soup without reporting being full as long as there was still soup in the bowl.  This seems to indicate that most of the people in the study were using external factors to determine how much to eat, rather than paying attention to signals from their body.  I can try to look up the study if you&#8217;re interested, it won an Ignobel prize this fall. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

